Max Connect
Max Connect · evidence atom

Target-profile DD can shape wedge choice

MAXCONNECT-OPP-011 · OPP · red · medium

← Pack hub

---

id: MAXCONNECT-OPP-011

title: Target-profile DD can shape wedge choice

type: OPP

state: red

area: G-business

purpose: gtm

priority: S

work_kind: A

provenance: synthesis

confidence: medium

triangulated: false

engagement: maxconnect

sources:

- uri: file://notebooklm/answers/20260612T-client-profiles-dd.md

role: supporting

- uri: file://outputs/target-client-profiles-dd.md

role: supporting

relates_to:

- MAXCONNECT-PERSONA-007

- MAXCONNECT-OPP-002

- MAXCONNECT-OPP-006

- MAXCONNECT-OPP-007

- MAXCONNECT-OPP-009

feeds_atoms: []

open_questions:

- Which target profile has the clearest buying trigger for Max Connect's first offer?

- Is the best wedge education, readiness assessment, AppPoints modelling, partner navigation, or community/content for each profile?

- What DD signals should trigger prioritising a named account or vertical?

needs_validation:

- Validate profile-specific wedge fit with Rich Barber and Andrew Carrie.

- Perform public DD on named businesses/accounts before making GTM recommendations.

resolution_log: []

module:

---

The target-client profile source creates a useful due-diligence workstream for choosing Max Connect's first wedge. The four profile groups have different triggers:

That means Max Connect's offer may need to vary by profile. Education may work where the transition is confusing; readiness assessment may work where data/integration/migration risk is high; AppPoints modelling may work where licensing exposure is poorly understood; partner navigation may work where specialist implementation routes are unclear.

This belongs in the rebuilt opportunity pack as a target-profile analysis section with explicit blanks for Rich Barber and Andrew Carrie to fill.

Open questions

Amendment log